|
|
Ortsverband Horgau |
|
Daten zur Gemeinderatswahl 2008
| Gemeinderäte, Name | Gruppe | Stimmen | Prozent | |
| 1 | Mayr, Ulrich jun. | CSU | 888 | 5,47% |
| 2 | Tögel, Jürgen | BV | 843 | 5,20% |
| 3 | Wehrle, Mathilde | CSU | 739 | 4,56% |
| 4 | Ohnesorg, Johann | BV | 709 | 4,37% |
| 5 | Kraus. Anton | CSU | 654 | 4,03% |
| 6 | Engelmayr, Martin | FW | 641 | 3,95% |
| 7 | Mozet, Andreas | BV | 632 | 3,90% |
| 8 | Steinle, Walter | BV | 439 | 2,71% |
| 9 | Dr. Bruckmeir, Georg | CSU | 429 | 2,64% |
| 10 | Hörmann, Christel | FW | 427 | 2,63% |
| 11 | Vogele, Klaus | BV | 424 | 2,61% |
| 12 | Christ, Thomas | FW | 313 | 1,93% |
| 13 | Beutlrock, Rudolf | BU | 276 | 1,70% |
| 14 | Kreidenweis, Gerhard | SPD | 275 | 1,70% |
| Gesamt | 16222 | 100,00% | ||
|
BV = Bürgerverein, FW = Freie Wähler, BU = Bündnis Umwelt |
||||
|
Stimmenzahl der Bewerber in den einzelnen Ortsteilen 2008 |
|||||||||||||
| gültige Stimmen insgesamt | Horgau | % der Horgauer Stimmen |
Horgauer- greut |
% der Greuter Stimmen |
Auer- bach |
% der Auerb. Stimmen |
Brief- wahl |
% der Brief Stimmen |
ins- gesamt |
in % aller Stimmen |
Rang in der Gruppe |
Rang un- ter allen Bewerbern |
|
| CSU | |||||||||||||
| Platz 01 | Mayr, Ulrich | 189 | 3,61% | 292 | 6,54% | 270 | 7,18% | 137 | 4,97% | 888 | 5,47% | 1 | 1 |
| Platz 02 | Wehrle, Mathilde | 271 | 5,17% | 171 | 3,83% | 189 | 5,03% | 108 | 3,92% | 739 | 4,56% | 2 | 3 |
| Platz 03 | Kraus, Anton | 134 | 2,56% | 95 | 2,13% | 322 | 8,56% | 103 | 3,74% | 654 | 4,03% | 3 | 5 |
| Platz 04 | Dr. Bruckmeir, Georg | 168 | 3,20% | 88 | 1,97% | 116 | 3,08% | 57 | 2,07% | 429 | 2,64% | 4 | 9 |
| Platz 05 | Lüftner, Manfred | 57 | 1,09% | 35 | 0,78% | 120 | 3,19% | 35 | 1,27% | 247 | 1,52% | 8 | 22 |
| Platz 06 | Kawalla, Johann | 68 | 1,30% | 82 | 1,84% | 59 | 1,57% | 22 | 0,80% | 231 | 1,42% | 9 | 24 |
| Platz 07 | Wagner, Gabriele | 76 | 1,45% | 77 | 1,73% | 49 | 1,30% | 19 | 0,69% | 221 | 1,36% | 10 | 29 |
| Platz 08 | Dierdorf, Kai | 57 | 1,09% | 49 | 1,10% | 34 | 0,90% | 7 | 0,25% | 147 | 0,91% | 14 | 44 |
| Platz 09 | Kleinheinz, Karl | 47 | 0,90% | 37 | 0,83% | 74 | 1,97% | 14 | 0,51% | 172 | 1,06% | 12 | 38 |
| Platz 10 | Kohler, Centa | 95 | 1,81% | 61 | 1,37% | 185 | 4,92% | 28 | 1,02% | 369 | 2,27% | 5 | 12 |
|
Platz 11 |
Schierlinger, Andreas | 69 | 1,32% | 94 | 2,11% | 83 | 2,21% | 36 | 1,31% | 282 | 1,74% | 7 | 16 |
| Platz 12 | Seiler, Georg jun. | 46 | 0,88% | 40 | 0,90% | 171 | 4,55% | 51 | 1,85% | 308 | 1,90% | 6 | 14 |
| Platz 13 | Wirth, Friedrich | 68 | 1,30% | 26 | 0,58% | 37 | 0,98% | 21 | 0,76% | 152 | 0,94% | 13 | 43 |
| Platz 14 | Liebhäuser, Helmi | 42 | 0,80% | 78 | 1,75% | 38 | 1,01% | 15 | 0,54% | 173 | 1,07% | 11 | 37 |
| CSU-Bewerber gesamt | 1387 | 26,46% | 1225 | 27,45% | 1747 | 46,45% | 653 | 23,69% | 5012 | 30,90% | |||
| Durchschnitt d. CSU-Bewerber | 99,07 | 1,89% | 87,50 | 1,96% | 124,79 | 3,32% | 46,64 | 1,69% | 358,00 | 2,21% | |||
| SPD | |||||||||||||
| Platz 01 | Kreidenweis, Gerhard | 110 | 2,10% | 78 | 1,75% | 55 | 1,46% | 32 | 1,16% | 275 | 1,70% | 1 | 18 |
| Platz 02 | Jungwirth, Günter | 19 | 0,36% | 40 | 0,90% | 29 | 0,77% | 10 | 0,36% | 98 | 0,60% | 7 | 51 |
| Platz 03 | Schneeberger, Ilona | 21 | 0,40% | 23 | 0,52% | 33 | 0,88% | 19 | 0,69% | 96 | 0,59% | 8 | 52 |
| Platz 04 | Martin, Manfred | 24 | 0,46% | 20 | 0,45% | 91 | 2,42% | 23 | 0,83% | 158 | 0,97% | 3 | 41 |
| Platz 05 | Dr. Wleklinski, ClausGünther | 24 | 0,46% | 41 | 0,92% | 23 | 0,61% | 24 | 0,87% | 112 | 0,69% | 4 | 48 |
| Platz 06 | Giesen, Marc-Aaron | 28 | 0,53% | 35 | 0,78% | 23 | 0,61% | 14 | 0,51% | 100 | 0,62% | 6 | 50 |
| Platz 07 | Zymara, Heike | 37 | 0,71% | 36 | 0,81% | 24 | 0,64% | 15 | 0,54% | 112 | 0,69% | 4 | 49 |
| Platz 08 | Mayerhauser, Dietmar | 29 | 0,55% | 54 | 1,21% | 59 | 1,57% | 38 | 1,38% | 180 | 1,11% | 2 | 36 |
| Platz 09 | Egert, German | 31 | 0,59% | 17 | 0,38% | 6 | 0,16% | 7 | 0,25% | 61 | 0,38% | 12 | 60 |
| Platz 10 | Mayerhauser, Gertrud | 17 | 0,32% | 16 | 0,36% | 24 | 0,64% | 14 | 0,51% | 71 | 0,44% | 11 | 59 |
| Platz 11 | Vogg, Hubert | 18 | 0,34% | 24 | 0,54% | 17 | 0,45% | 23 | 0,83% | 82 | 0,51% | 10 | 55 |
| Platz 12 | Zymara, Werner | 32 | 0,61% | 36 | 0,81% | 11 | 0,29% | 15 | 0,54% | 94 | 0,58% | 9 | 53 |
| Platz 13 | Käsmayr, Theo | 11 | 0,21% | 22 | 0,49% | 5 | 0,13% | 16 | 0,58% | 54 | 0,33% | 13 | 61 |
| Platz 14 | Beck, Josef | 6 | 0,11% | 26 | 0,58% | 6 | 0,16% | 14 | 0,51% | 52 | 0,32% | 14 | 62 |
| SPD-Bewerber gesamt | 407 | 7,76% | 468 | 10,49% | 406 | 10,80% | 264 | 9,58% | 1545 | 9,53% | |||
| Durchschnitt d. SPD-Bewerber | 29,07 | 0,55% | 33,43 | 0,75% | 29,00 | 0,77% | 18,86 | 0,68% | 110,36 | 0,68% | |||
| Bürgerverein | |||||||||||||
| Platz 01 | Ohnesorg, Johann | 312 | 5,95% | 212 | 4,75% | 70 | 1,86% | 115 | 4,17% | 709 | 4,37% | 2 | 4 |
| Platz 02 | Tögel, Jürgen | 267 | 5,09% | 287 | 6,43% | 129 | 3,43% | 160 | 5,81% | 843 | 5,20% | 1 | 2 |
| Platz 03 | Maier, Gerd | 118 | 2,25% | 61 | 1,37% | 32 | 0,85% | 41 | 1,49% | 252 | 1,55% | 7 | 21 |
| Platz 04 | Mozet, Andreas | 159 | 3,03% | 111 | 2,49% | 223 | 5,93% | 139 | 5,04% | 632 | 3,90% | 3 | 7 |
| Platz 05 | Vogele, Klaus | 139 | 2,65% | 160 | 3,59% | 60 | 1,60% | 65 | 2,36% | 424 | 2,61% | 5 | 11 |
| Platz 06 | Steinle, Walter | 196 | 3,74% | 88 | 1,97% | 73 | 1,94% | 82 | 2,98% | 439 | 2,71% | 4 | 8 |
| Platz 07 | Uhr, Martin | 107 | 2,04% | 81 | 1,81% | 47 | 1,25% | 55 | 2,00% | 290 | 1,79% | 6 | 15 |
| Platz 08 | Tögel, Christina | 87 | 1,66% | 70 | 1,57% | 20 | 0,53% | 37 | 1,34% | 214 | 1,32% | 10 | 31 |
| Platz 09 | Holland, Brigitte | 43 | 0,82% | 86 | 1,93% | 28 | 0,74% | 24 | 0,87% | 181 | 1,12% | 13 | 35 |
| Platz 10 | Steinlein, Heidi | 102 | 1,95% | 34 | 0,76% | 26 | 0,69% | 39 | 1,42% | 201 | 1,24% | 12 | 33 |
| Platz 11 | Matt, Sebastian | 44 | 0,84% | 116 | 2,60% | 29 | 0,77% | 41 | 1,49% | 230 | 1,42% | 8 | 25 |
| Platz 12 | Hildensperger, Martin | 117 | 2,23% | 42 | 0,94% | 22 | 0,58% | 44 | 1,60% | 225 | 1,39% | 9 | 28 |
| Platz 13 | Dietrich, Herbert | 115 | 2,19% | 41 | 0,92% | 16 | 0,43% | 42 | 1,52% | 214 | 1,32% | 10 | 32 |
| Platz 14 | Dr. Mc Carthy, Kevin | 72 | 1,37% | 45 | 1,01% | 21 | 0,56% | 27 | 0,98% | 165 | 1,02% | 14 | 40 |
| ^ | 1878 | 35,83% | 1434 | 32,13% | 796 | 21,16% | 911 | 33,06% | 5019 | 30,94% | |||
| Durchschnitt d. BV-Bewerber | 134,14 | 2,56% | 102,43 | 2,30% | 56,86 | 1,51% | 65,07 | 2,36% | 358,50 | 2,21% | |||
| Freie Wähler | |||||||||||||
| Platz 01 | Hörmann, Christel | 148 | 2,82% | 130 | 2,91% | 63 | 1,68% | 86 | 3,12% | 427 | 2,63% | 2 | 10 |
| Platz 02 | Engelmayr, Martin | 252 | 4,81% | 158 | 3,54% | 99 | 2,63% | 132 | 4,79% | 641 | 3,95% | 1 | 6 |
| Platz 03 | Christ, Thomas | 101 | 1,93% | 65 | 1,46% | 95 | 2,53% | 52 | 1,89% | 313 | 1,93% | 3 | 13 |
| Platz 04 | Wieland, Brigitte | 63 | 1,20% | 78 | 1,75% | 42 | 1,12% | 35 | 1,27% | 218 | 1,34% | 8 | 30 |
| Platz 05 | Steinle, Josef jun. | 108 | 2,06% | 87 | 1,95% | 40 | 1,06% | 39 | 1,42% | 274 | 1,69% | 4 | 19 |
| Platz 06 | Steppich, Peter jun. | 38 | 0,72% | 133 | 2,98% | 24 | 0,64% | 31 | 1,12% | 226 | 1,39% | 6 | 26 |
| Platz 07 | Hofmeister, Elisabeth | 107 | 2,04% | 60 | 1,34% | 16 | 0,43% | 43 | 1,56% | 226 | 1,39% | 6 | 27 |
| Platz 08 | Fischer, Franz | 22 | 0,42% | 60 | 1,34% | 21 | 0,56% | 31 | 1,12% | 134 | 0,83% | 11 | 45 |
| Platz 09 | Paschkewitz, Erich | 24 | 0,46% | 23 | 0,52% | 10 | 0,27% | 24 | 0,87% | 81 | 0,50% | 13 | 57 |
| Platz 10 | Mayr, Manfred | 31 | 0,59% | 21 | 0,47% | 12 | 0,32% | 23 | 0,83% | 87 | 0,54% | 12 | 54 |
| Platz 11 | Rink, Reinhard | 21 | 0,40% | 21 | 0,47% | 11 | 0,29% | 25 | 0,91% | 78 | 0,48% | 14 | 58 |
| Platz 12 | Band, Josef | 58 | 1,11% | 30 | 0,67% | 27 | 0,72% | 54 | 1,96% | 169 | 1,04% | 9 | 39 |
| Platz 13 | Steppe, Thomas | 74 | 1,41% | 70 | 1,57% | 65 | 1,73% | 47 | 1,71% | 256 | 1,58% | 5 | 20 |
| Platz 14 | Holl, Martina | 48 | 0,92% | 29 | 0,65% | 36 | 0,96% | 40 | 1,45% | 153 | 0,94% | 10 | 42 |
| FW-Bewerber gesamt | 1095 | 20,89% | 965 | 21,62% | 561 | 14,92% | 662 | 24,02% | 3283 | 20,24% | |||
| Durchschnitt d. FW-Bewerber | 78,21 | 1,49% | 68,93 | 1,54% | 40,07 | 1,07% | 47,29 | 1,72% | 234,50 | 1,45% | |||
| Bündnis Umwelt | |||||||||||||
| Platz 01 | Beutlrock, Rudolf | 71 | 1,35% | 93 | 2,08% | 66 | 1,75% | 46 | 1,67% | 276 | 1,70% | 1 | 17 |
| Platz 02 | Rennig, Elisabeth | 50 | 0,95% | 40 | 0,90% | 27 | 0,72% | 7 | 0,25% | 124 | 0,76% | 4 | 46 |
| Platz 03 | Mayr-Steer, Christine | 64 | 1,22% | 53 | 1,19% | 38 | 1,01% | 40 | 1,45% | 195 | 1,20% | 3 | 34 |
| Platz 04 | Seiler, Anton | 53 | 1,01% | 29 | 0,65% | 11 | 0,29% | 29 | 1,05% | 122 | 0,75% | 5 | 47 |
| Platz 05 | Steer, Günter | 89 | 1,70% | 53 | 1,19% | 35 | 0,93% | 70 | 2,54% | 247 | 1,52% | 2 | 23 |
| Platz 06 | Hagner, Johannes | 16 | 0,31% | 13 | 0,29% | 8 | 0,21% | 5 | 0,18% | 42 | 0,26% | 10 | 66 |
| Platz 07 | Hellmann, Ulrike | 15 | 0,29% | 19 | 0,43% | 6 | 0,16% | 5 | 0,18% | 45 | 0,28% | 8 | 64 |
| Platz 08 | Escheu, Xaver | 30 | 0,57% | 25 | 0,56% | 9 | 0,24% | 18 | 0,65% | 82 | 0,51% | 6 | 56 |
| Platz 09 | Mair, Birgit | 16 | 0,31% | 8 | 0,18% | 14 | 0,37% | 7 | 0,25% | 45 | 0,28% | 8 | 65 |
| Platz 10 | Hanslmeier, Lilia | 11 | 0,21% | 7 | 0,16% | 12 | 0,32% | 5 | 0,18% | 35 | 0,22% | 12 | 68 |
| Platz 11 | Wenisch-Mayr, Renate | 20 | 0,38% | 7 | 0,16% | 6 | 0,16% | 14 | 0,51% | 47 | 0,29% | 7 | 63 |
| Platz 12 | Hellman, Klaus | 9 | 0,17% | 10 | 0,22% | 6 | 0,16% | 14 | 0,51% | 47 | 0,29% | 14 | 70 |
| Platz 13 | Hanslmeier, Peter | 12 | 0,23% | 6 | 0,13% | 7 | 0,19% | 8 | 0,29% | 33 | 0,20% | 13 | 69 |
| Platz 14 | Rennig, Johannes | 19 | 0,36% | 8 | 0,18% | 6 | 0,16% | 8 | 0,29% | 41 | 0,25% | 11 | 67 |
| Bünd.Umwelt Bewerber | 475 | 9,06% | 371 | 8,31% | 251 | 6,67% | 266 | 9,65% | 1363 | 8,40% | |||
| Durchschnitt Bünd.Umwelt-Be | 33,93 | 0,65% | 26,50 | 0,59% | 17,93 | 0,48% | 19,00 | 0,69% | 97,36 | 0,60% | |||
| Summe | 5242 | 100,00% | 4463 | 100,00% | 3761 | 100,00% | 2756 | 100% | 16222 | 100,00% | |||
| Durchschnitt aller Bewerber | 74,89 | 63,76 | 53,73 | 39,37 | 231,74 | ||||||||
|
|
näher am Menschen |
|